article |
August 29, 2018
Drive Double-Digit Revenue Growth by Interlocking Compensation Design & Territory Alignment
By: John Marcsisin
It’s December 25th, 2018. You are sitting around the Christmas tree with your wife, two kids and black lab—Duffers. You hear the crackle of the fireplace as another log gets added to the fire. The kids are smiling from ear to ear; “Mommy, mommy, look what Santa brought us this year.” You cannot help but smile.
You head to the kitchen and grab your favorite short tumbler glass. First, a dash of simple syrup and angostura bitters, then a good pour of whiskey. Finish it off with two luxardo cherries, one for good luck. You take a sip. “Ahhh”. Everything is perfect.
What a difference a year can make.
You think back to a year ago when you were:
It was obvious something was broken. It just wasn’t obvious what that something was. Maybe it was the sales compensation design. Maybe it was the quota-setting methodology. Maybe it was the territory design. It was all three.
Download the Territory Alignment Tool to map and track your various sales territories, evaluate your territory’s criteria and financial goals, and track various data such as Employees assigned, sales plan, and region of territory.
The Interlock Challenge
Each year, organizations strive to benchmark their compensation plans against industry and market practice; most organizations believe that aligning design principles to best practice will result in improved productivity. True in some cases, many organizations
neglect territory alignment and quota-setting, resulting in money left on the table. According to Gartner, “Enterprises will miss the equivalent of at least 10 percent of total annual sales in “lost opportunity” revenue that could have been captured with improved processes for defining, assigning and managing territories, quotas, and incentives and compensation plans.”
In It’s Time to Start Thinking About 2019 Sales Compensation Design, the statements on page 2 help determine your alignment to market on compensation design. We follow a similar logic for quota-setting and territory design below.
Consider how you would answer the following statements:
Answering “no” to any of the above statements indicates a possible misalignment to best practice.
Common symptoms of misaligned territories include:
Download the territory alignment tool to better understand if redesign may be needed.
The Good, The Bad and The Ugly with Territory Alignment
Studies show over 75% of companies are missing 3-8% of sales because of territory misalignment. Simple improvements can help capture this opportunity—without any change in total resources or sales strategy.
So why is territory design often neglected? The common symptoms of poor territory design can be incorrectly attributed to other issues.
Attrition in a particular territory can indicate the need to refine rep development and training programs. It can also be a biproduct of poor territory design. There is a strong correlation between sales and territory potential. Reps with low territory potential often make less. They become quickly discouraged. Especially when less talented peers are getting rich with high-opportunity accounts in adjacent territories.
There are two common sales compensation approaches – cost of labor (quota) and cost of sale (commissions). In either approach, it is critical to have similar earnings opportunity across the sales people. Otherwise, the measures used to evaluate rep performance will be more impacted by the territory makeup—not necessarily the sales person.
For example, in commission-based plans, territory size is often the primary driver in incentive pay. Not rep performance or territory growth.
Some sales reps do not follow up on high quality leads; others spend too much time on low-potential accounts. Both are problems and highlight the need for better account segmentation or coaching.
They can also be the result of misaligned territories. If sales reps have too many accounts, they will ignore good leads. Reps do not have enough time and instead focus on quick wins. On the flip side, if there is not ample opportunity, salespeople may over cover their low-potential accounts.
Best-in-class organizations have their reps spend approximately 60-70% of their time on selling activities. Few organizations are able to accomplish this feat. Many reps get bogged down in internal meetings and administrative tasks (i.e. order entry). This could signal a need for coaching or additional resources.
These same reps also indicate spending a large percentage of their time behind the wheel. This is more commonly known as windshield time. And it’s the result of territories being designed without consideration for the territory makeup. This can include distance between accounts or even traffic.
Refer to Baseline Selling Time to Increase Revenue Per Sales Head by Scott Gruher to quantify the impact of increasing rep selling time.
Territory misalignment can be the result of a revised company strategy, like entry into a new market. Or even a new product launch. It could also be the result of a new sales force size or structure. To stay current with organization and market needs, territory effectiveness should be evaluated periodically. It is recommended that organizations review territory design at least every two years. Otherwise, you might be stifling revenue growth.
There is no longer an excuse for neglecting territory design as a primary driver of rep productivity. Fortunately, there is more data available today than ever before. Mapping software exists to take the guesswork out of designing territories. The result is improved customer coverage, a reinforced pay for performance culture—which aids in the retention of top sales talent—and increased selling time.
Download the Territory Alignment Tool to map and track your various sales territories, evaluate your territory’s criteria and financial goals, and track various data such as Employees assigned, sales plan, and region of territory.
Additional Resources
Download the SBI App for all SBI Content, on the go.
John has nearly six years of consulting experience focused on sales force effectiveness, incentive plan design, executive compensation and broad-based rewards aimed at helping clients achieve short and long-term business objectives.
John’s experience includes working with organizations in varying levels of change, including: start up, wholesale transformation, and merger & acquisition. He is tasked with developing sales force effectiveness strategies and processes that attract/focus/motivate/retain top talent. Specific areas of focus include: sales coverage model, performance benchmarking, sales compensation design, account segmentation and financial analysis/modeling.
Read full bio >Any CEO can attest to the current level of difficulty in closing deals. Customer sentiment and indiv...
While every industry has been impacted by the ongoing pandemic, private equity professionals have ha...
As we round out 2020 and begin to look ahead to 2021, the topic of revenue planning is surely at the...
In a world of uncertainty, market leaders are sure which customer touchpoints require prioritization...
It may be easy to assume that tech-enabled services became an overnight success in the wake of the w...
As you continually work on fine-tuning your sales organization, how can you best ensure that every p...
For market-leading software companies, the changing economic conditions have had a positive effect o...
The New York Stock Exchange dates to May 17, 1792, with the signing of the Buttonwood Agreement&mdas...
SBI TV episodes bring you Sales and Marketing insights from B2B industry thought leaders and growth experts, on topics like product, pricing, customer experience and success, and go to market. Catch up on new and previous episodes here.