article | September 8, 2018
The Best Methods and Worst Approaches to Use for Next Year’s Territory Design
As we rapidly approach Q4, you are behind the ball if you haven’t finalized your 2019 Territory Design. According to Harvard Business Review, “Research shows that optimizing territory design can increase sales by 2% to 7%, without any change in total resources or sales strategy.” However, a misaligned territory design can oftentimes be worse than no territory design at all. In the next paragraphs we will review the common mistakes that your competitors make when designing their territories, and provide a tool for you to begin gathering the necessary information to create an effective 2019 Territory Design.
Whether you are starting from scratch, redesigning your current model, or expanding over last year’s model, the benefits of territory design mean that you are targeting the right customers at the right time, and assigning the right accounts to the right reps. Not to mention, you now know exactly who and where you need to hire in order to hit your number.
Download the Territory Design Approach Tool to follow a proven best practice approach, provide your team with a roadmap, and validate or identify gaps in your existing model.
Traditionally, a “territory” has referred to a geographical region or area assigned to a team or rep. However, in modern times, you cannot afford to utilize a traditional model. Today’s cutting edge territory designs encompass many different perspectives including, but not limited to, geography, sales potential, customer type, rep capabilities, salesforce capacity, and market movements. The vast majority of territory design flaws are less the result of what inputs you do use, and more the result of what inputs you don’t use. Read on for common errors in territory design.
Common Territory Design Flaws
As stated earlier, geography has been the status quo default for novice territory designers. As such, you are more likely to over-index than under-index on this factor. As the IoT continues to advance and customer buying patterns evolve, we expect to see less and less emphasis placed on geography as an input to territory design. However, for the time being, it would be an absolute miscalculation to not include the geographical perspective in your territory design.
In order to properly execute territory design, you need to isolate the value of each account. This measurement process can be based on both quantitative and qualitative factors, depending on the nature of your business. For example, product-heavy businesses would probably rank the value of their customers by forecasted demand levels, while a service company that depends on customer referrals would most likely place higher prioritization on customers that are more likely to refer them. At SBI, we use Account Segmentation as the primary means to identify sales potential.
Customers are different and require different sales approaches. Too many of today’s territory designs ignore this fact and, as a result, do not realize the results that they could have achieved. By analyzing and grouping your customers into tiers (this could be by size, seasonal buying trends, etc.), you ensure that you are speaking your customers’ unique languages.
One of the most common factors that sub-par territory designs exclude is individual rep capability. Ideally, all of your reps are A Players. However, that situation is rarely the case. Your territory design needs to reflect the fact that your talent is not spread equally across your reps.
Above we mentioned individual rep capability, but it is equally important to think about your overall salesforce capability. By assigning too many customers and prospect accounts to reps, you directly diminish your customer count. As a result, your reps are overworked, and your customers are underserved. An effective territory design must include a measurement of salesforce capability.
Another common mistake we see in territory designs are models that pay no respect to movement in the marketplace. These territory designs are static and unchanging. The easiest way to make a territory design ineffective is to create it in a vacuum – that is, to design a territory that cannot adapt to changes in the market, mergers, and changes in your salesforce. An effective territory design must be flexible and iterative.
This list of common mistakes in territory design is not exhaustive. The key here is that a generic, “one size fits all” model just doesn’t cut it anymore. To win today, you need to consider multiple factors when designing your territories. For more information on territory design best practices, take a look at our SBI Q3 Research Report.
For an initial list of essential metrics needed to design an effective territory, use our Territory Design Approach Tool.
Need a territory design overhaul? Schedule a working session at SBI’s Studio.
Located in Dallas, TX, our facility offers state-of-the-art meeting rooms, lounge, full-service bar, and a studio used to tape our TV shows. SBI provides the location and facilitators, all at a compelling price point.
As a guest of The Studio, you’ll get unlimited access to SBI’s CEO, Partners, and a handpicked team of Sales Talent experts. Together we’ll focus on developing an action plan to optimize your Territory Design by getting a month of work done in just eight hours. It’s an amplified experience that you can only get in one place: The Studio. I hope you join us.
© 2017 Sales Benchmark Index (SBI)
A Business Strategy Consulting Company
2021 McKinney Avenue, Suite 550
Dallas, TX 75201
© 2018 Sales Benchmark Index (SBI), B.V.
A Business Strategy Consulting Company
Cornelis Troostsraat 29
Amsterdam, The Netherlands